Volume 1, Issue 02 - April 1998Relational Ethics. What is it?
"Ethical behaviour is not the display of one's moral rectitude in times of crisis," says nurse Myra Levine, "It is the day-to-day expression of one's commitment to other persons and the ways in which human beings relate to one another in their daily interactions.1
"The Chinese character for acupuncture means golden needles. For me," says physician Dr. Steven Aung, "this symbolizes that the needle is only a bridge between myself and my patients. It is a bridge built on compassion and the cultivations of physical, mental and spiritual energy. This is what does the healingnot the needle. The really important thing is the relationship of trust and respect between healer and patient."2 It is the business of caregivers to explore the reasons, and even argue, with patients about the decisions they wish to make because, says lawyer Robert Burt, people are connected to each other. Caregivers (doctors, nurses, and others) are human beings who are necessarily involved in another's life, so, "we have to negotiate together what our shared meanings are about, what it is that you want me to do or not to do." In fact, says Burt, "it is correct not only for me to say, 'Why do you want to do that?' but it is permissible for me argue with you if I disagree, and to argue strenuously with you on a variety of grounds."3 Myra Levine, Steven Aung, and Robert Burt point to an ethic of relationshipsthat striving to make connections with people, through trust and respect, in order to express compassion in giving the necessary care and treatment. Relational ethics means initiating and maintaining conversation, and it means that ethics is found in the day-to-day obligations and responses to one another. I have come think of relational ethics as having four central concepts: 1) ethics is "how" we treat each other while clinical concerns attend to the "why" of a particular treatment; 2) ethical action is reciprocal (that is, providers and recipients both give and both receive); 3) personhood (autonomy) is developed and expressed through connections between people rather than through individual rights; and 4) ethics is the question "what should I do now?" rather than the statement "this is what you should do now." As action ethics, relational ethics looks to the way we are with each other as doctors, patients, nurses, families, or chaplains. We are participants by being with rather than merely spectators who only observe, advise, or treat. Relational ethics builds on the premise that "human experience is, in principle, shared experience" which leads us to understand ourselves, as persons, not as an 'I' but as a 'You and I', wrote the philosopher John Macmurray in 1961.4 "It is an illusion that we are individuals, isolated individuals," says a member of the Relational Ethics Research Project, "we are made of the same stuff. We were social when we were born. I mean, we were born of a woman, our origins are social. If we could only see in ourselves that we are bits of everybody it would be easier."5 Relational ethics attends to those connections that bind us together as humans. Perhaps we could say that with relational ethics we focus on "who we are" rather than "what we do," that it is a way of being rather than a mode of decision making.6 It is how we insert a needle, how we enter into conversation, how we show respect, or how we are with each other. Knowledge of ethical theories and principles are vital in this conception of ethics, yet such knowledge, alone, is not sufficient for ethical practice. In working from a relational ethic one would not be content watching a person die after making a fully competent choice to forgo treatment; rather it would be important to be with the dying person. For the last five years, an interdisciplinary group of healthcare professionals and academics have been involved in a research project called Relational Ethics. Foundation for Health Care. This research is funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (1993-2000). In this research, we want to develop an ethic for health care that parallels the rich complexity of actual human relations and to recognize and build on the moral significance of these relationships.7 The interdisciplinary research team focuses on concrete experiences (healthcare scenarios) in order to develop a comprehensive practical understanding of ethical commitments. Our goals are to describe ethical relationships through exploring themes identified through the research process: engaged interaction, mutual respect, embodiment (embodied knowledge), uncertainty or vulnerability, freedom and choice, and the significance of the environment. These themes are being developed into a text entitled Relational Ethics. The Full Meaning of Respect which we plan to have available within the next year. Early on in the research project we realized that words may not necessarily be the best way to describe the experience of relational ethics so we began to explore other approaches. We gathered personal stories or narratives, images (developed a slide series called "Is this Ethics?"), and drama (wrote, acted, and produced a video called "and, they want a child.") Narratives, images, and drama have great potential to teach about ourselves and the nature of healthcare work, to sharpen visual senses, generate new insights and understandings, and to promote ethical awareness.8 In a relational ethic both the heart and the mind must be stimulated as neither mind nor emotion alone is adequate. In reality, relational ethics is already practised in health care: in the thoughtful way we treat students and colleagues, the way we welcome babies and comfort elders, the way we express compassion to both the suffering of patients and families and the suffering of providers who are faced regularly with human tragedies, and so on. The goal in the research is to articulate this relational perspective in a comprehensive and philosophically well grounded way which includes and extends traditional ethical theories. The objective is to turn thinking about ethics and our ethical commitments to the reality of how and where we experience them within health care practice. Please consider this brief document as a working draft, one in which you are welcome to add your voice. Please contact Sandy MacPhail, Project Director, or Vangie Bergum, Principal Investigator at the John Dossetor Health Ethics Centre (492-6676) with any comments you wish to contribute. References1Levine,
Myra. (1977). Nursing ethics and the ethical nurse. American Journal
of Nursing, 77:5, p. 846. Vangie Bergum, Co-Director, interim, John Dossetor Health Ethics Centre
Announcements
Administrative Changes at PHEN:
Other News
Dr. Tom Noseworthy, Professor and Chair of the Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, University of Alberta, and member of the former National Forum on Health, will launch PHEN's Third AGM and Provincial Workshop to be held in Calgary on May 8 & 9, 1998. Dr. Noseworthy's lecture is a free public session. The AGM & Workshop is entitled Strengthening the Moral Foundations of Health Care, and will be of interest to members of ethics committees and other service providers/members of the general public with an interest in Alberta health ethics issues. Full details on our web site.
Questions or comments about this publication are welcome and can be directed to either PHEN office. Please feel free to copy and distribute this document.
Views offered in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Provincial Health Ethics Network.
|
|




Issues
and Prospects for Canada's Health Care System